Volume Race

Legal tracker / Nevada v. Kalshi (state court)

Case · as of Oct 15, 2026

Nevada v. Kalshi (state court)

For the states Preliminary injunction in effect; appeal pending

Judge Jason Woodbury enjoined Kalshi from offering sports, election and entertainment contracts to people in Nevada without a gaming license, and the Nevada Supreme Court declined to stay the injunction pending Kalshi's appeal. After the Board sought contempt over geofencing gaps, Kalshi stipulated in late July 2026 to deploy multi-source geofencing by Aug. 12, 2026 or face $120,000-per-day penalties.

Case record last checked against its sources on Sep 30, 2026.

CaseState of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Gaming Control Board v. KalshiEX, LLC
CourtFirst Judicial District Court, Carson City, Nevada; Supreme Court of Nevada
Docket26 OC 00050 1B (Carson City Dist. Ct.); 92771 (Nev.); removal 2:26-cv-00406 (D. Nev., remanded)
FiledFeb 17, 2026
TypeEnforcement
CompaniesKalshi
Other sideNevada Gaming Control Board
Last actionJul 23, 2026: Contempt dispute resolved by stipulation (filed July 23, 2026) requiring third-party geofencing by Aug. 12, 2026 or $120,000-per-day penalties.
Next date: Nevada Supreme Court appeal of the preliminary injunction (No. 92771) pending.

History

Newest first.

DateWhat happened
Jul 23, 2026Contempt dispute resolved by stipulation filed July 23: third-party geofencing by Aug. 12 or $120,000 a day.
Jul 1, 2026Nevada Supreme Court denied Kalshi's emergency motion for a stay pending appeal (date per secondary reporting).
Apr 28, 2026Written preliminary injunction entered (as cited in New Jersey's cert petition).
Apr 3, 2026Judge Woodbury announced he would grant a preliminary injunction.
Mar 20, 2026State court entered a temporary restraining order.
Mar 2, 2026D. Nev. (Judge Miranda Du) remanded the case to state court.
Feb 17, 2026Board filed civil enforcement action; Kalshi removed it to federal court the same day.

Sources

Nevada v. Kalshi (state court): questions

What is the status of Nevada v. Kalshi (state court)?

Preliminary injunction in effect; appeal pending. Judge Jason Woodbury enjoined Kalshi from offering sports, election and entertainment contracts to people in Nevada without a gaming license, and the Nevada Supreme Court declined to stay the injunction pending Kalshi's appeal. After the Board sought contempt over geofencing gaps, Kalshi stipulated in late July 2026 to deploy multi-source geofencing by Aug. 12, 2026 or face $120,000-per-day penalties.

What happened most recently in Nevada v. Kalshi (state court)?

Jul 23, 2026: Contempt dispute resolved by stipulation (filed July 23, 2026) requiring third-party geofencing by Aug. 12, 2026 or $120,000-per-day penalties.

What is the next date in Nevada v. Kalshi (state court)?

: Nevada Supreme Court appeal of the preliminary injunction (No. 92771) pending.

Compiled from court dockets, opinions, regulator releases and news coverage, linked above. Not legal advice. Nevada: every action · All cases · Interactive tracker